Structural Model of Indicators for IT Specialists’ Qualification Assessment Based on Data Mining of Information Systems
https://doi.org/10.55648/1998-6920-2023-17-4-15-33
Abstract
The key factors for the success of an IT organization project are its people and professional quality. To meet the need for professional growth, management adheres to the constant assessment of the employee’s qualification. However, the low level of reliability and accuracy of the assessment results associated with the subjective opinion of the management may lead to the negative consequences of decisions. For fast results and high accuracy of proficiency testing, assessment models and software testers have been developed to support decision-making based on a large number of results obtained using data mining of information systems in the work of IT specialists. In the present work, a factor analysis was carried out to identify detection of such cases. The results of measurements, which are determined when evaluating the qualifications of IT specialists, cause factors associated with the occurrence of technical problems, the effectiveness and efficiency of testing as well as communication skills.
About the Authors
E. I. Gavriliev
Novosibirsk State Technical University (NSTU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Erchimen I. Gavriliev, Postgraduate student, Department of Theoretical and Applied Computer Science
630073, Novosibirsk, Karl Marks Ave. 20
Т. V. Avdeenko
Novosibirsk State Technical University (NSTU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatiana V. Avdeenko, Dr. of Sci. (Engineering), Professor, Department of Theoretical and Applied Computer Science
630073, Novosibirsk, Karl Marks Ave. 20
References
1. Gastaldi L, Corso M. Smart Healthcare Digitalization: Using ICT to Effectively Balance Exploration and Exploitation within Hospitals. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 2012, vol. 4. pp. 1-13.
2. Pearlman, K., Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E. Validity generalization for tests used to predict job proficiency and training success in clerical occupations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, vol. 65, no 4, pp. 373-406.
3. Rothstein H. R. Interrater reliability of job performance ratings: Growth to asymptote level with increasing opportunity to observe. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990, vol. 75, no 3, pp. 322-327.
4. Viswesvaran C., Ones D. S., Schmidt F. L. Comparative analysis of reliability of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996, vol. 81, no 5, pp.557-574.
5. Gavriliev E. I., Avdeenko T. V. Model and Procedure for Assessing the Qualification of a Software Developer. 2022 IEEE 23rd International Conference of Young Professionals in Electron Devices and Materials (EDM), 2022, pp. 303–307.
6. Gavriliev E. I., Avdeenko T. V. Procedura ocenki kvalifikacii razrabotchika programmnogo obespecheniya [Procedure for assessing the qualifications of a software developer]. Nauka. Tekhnologii. Innovacii: Collection of scientific papers. In 10 parts, Novosibirsk, 06-10 December, 2021, pp. 145-148.
7. Robillard M. P., Coelho W., Murphy G. C. How effective developers investigate source code: an exploratory study. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2004. vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 889-903.
8. Surakka S. What subjects and skills are important for software developers. Communications of the ACM, 2007, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 73-78.
9. Li P. L., Ko A. J, Begel A. What Makes a Great Software Engineer? 37th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2015, pp. 700-710.
10. Baltes S., Diehl S. Towards a theory of software development expertise. Proceedings of the 2018 26th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, ESEC/FSE 2018, 2018.
11. Bergersen G. R., Sjøberg D. I. K., Dybå T. Construction and validation of an instrument for measuring programming skill. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng, 2014, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 1163-1184.
12. Juristo N., Moreno A.M., Stigel W. Guest editors' introduction: Software testing practices in industry. IEEE Software, 2006, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 19-21.
13. Florea R., Stray V. The skills that employers look for in software testers. Software Quality Journal, 2019, no. 27, pp. 1449-1479.
14. Iivonen J., Mäntylä M.V., Itkonen J. Characteristics of high performing testers: a case. ESEM '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 2019, pp. 1-9.
15. Deak A. What Characterizes a Good Software Tester? – A Survey in Four Norwegian Companies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2014, no. 8763, pp. 162-172.
16. Gousios G, Kalliamvakou D., Spinellis E.D. Measuring developer contribution from software repository data. In Proceedings of the 2008 international working conference on Mining software repositories, MSR ’08, 2008, pp. 129-132.
17. Lanubile F., Ebert C., Prikladnicki R., Herzig R.K. A Collaboration Tools for Global Software Engineering. IEEE Software, 2010, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 52–55.
18. Zolkifli N. N., Ngah A., Deraman A. Version Control System: A Review. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2018, vol. 135, pp. 408-415.
19. Makashov P.A., Romanenko N.A. Servis-orientirovannyj podhod k upravleniyu IT proektami na primere ispol'zova-niya programmnogo produkta «JIRA» [Service-oriented approach to IT project management on the example of using JIRA software product]. Sovremennye informacionnye tekhnologii i IT-obrazovanie, 2015, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 127–132.
20. Collins E. F., Lucena Jr. V. Software Test Automation practices in agile development environment: An industry experience report. 2012 7th International Workshop on Automation of Software Test (AST), 2012, pp. 57–65.
21. Apraci I., Al-Emran M., Al-Sharafi M. A. The impact of knowledge management practices on the acceptance of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) by engineering students: A cross-cultural comparison. Telematics and Informatics, 2020, no. 54, pp. 1–13.
22. Gavriliev E. I., Avdeenko T. V. Mnogofaktornaya regressionnaya model' ocenki kvalifikacii testirovshchika programm-nogo obespecheniya [Multivariate regression model for assessing the qualifica-tions of a software tester]. Doklady TUSUR, 2022, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 115–121.
23. Tomita-parser, available at: https://tech.yandex.ru/tomita/ (accessed: 02.04.2023).
24. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) Test for Sampling Adequacy, available at: https://www.statisticshowto.com/kaiser-meyer-olkin/ (accessed: 16.04.2023).
25. Understanding Data Mapping Tools, Process, and Techniques, available at: https://www.astera.com/type/blog/understanding-data-mapping-and-itstechniques/ (accessed: 02.04.2023).
Review
For citations:
Gavriliev E.I., Avdeenko Т.V. Structural Model of Indicators for IT Specialists’ Qualification Assessment Based on Data Mining of Information Systems. The Herald of the Siberian State University of Telecommunications and Information Science. 2023;17(4):15-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55648/1998-6920-2023-17-4-15-33
Views:
275
Email this article 
