One Problem of Structural Optimization of Data Transmission Networks
https://doi.org/10.55648/1998-6920-2024-18-3-45-56
Abstract
The article discusses issues of analysis and structural optimization of multi-level data transmission networks using the random hypernetwork model. It is argued that the main level subjected to destruction under the influence of the external environment and affecting the performance of the network as a whole is the physical level, but in structural terms physical destruction primarily affects the channel level. In turn, failures at the link level affect the organization of work of the network and higher levels; in particular, they require the redistribution of flows including the rebuilding of virtual channels.
A brief overview of multi-level network models used for the analysis and structural optimization of data transmission networks for various purposes (in particular sensor monitoring networks) is presented, a description of a random hypernetwork is given and some problems of increasing the reliability of the functioning of networks at the network level in the event of possible failures of channels and network nodes are discussed, that is, disruption of its operation at the link level. As indicators of the reliability of the network layer of the network, the possibility (probability) of data transmission between a pair of nodes in principle or via established virtual channels and the mathematical expectation of the number of nodes capable of transmitting data to the central node are considered.
The goals of structural optimization are the best placement of virtual channels in the known structure of the channel network and the placement of base stations in network nodes which connection with the central node is considered to be reliable.
About the Authors
A. M. KalneyInstitute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics SB RAS
Russian Federation
Artyom M. Kalney - Engineer. Laboratory of System Modeling and Optimization, Institute of Computational Mathematics and mathematical geophysics SB RAS (ICMaMGSB RAS).
630090, Novosibirsk, Academician Lavrentiev Avenue St. 6
A. S. Rodionov
Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics SB RAS; Siberian State University of Telecommunications and Information Science (SibSUTIS)
Russian Federation
Aleksej S. Rodionov - Dr. of Sci. (Engineering); Head of the Laboratory of System Modeling and Optimization,fic Institute of Computational Mathematics and mathematical geophysics SB RAS (ICMaMG SB RAS); Professor of the Department of computer science, Siberian State University of Telecommunications and Information Science (SibSUTIS).
630090, Novosibirsk, AcademicianLavrentievAvenue St. 6
Phone: +7 383 3326949
References
1. Kalney A. M. Modeli mnogourovnevyh setej (kratkij obzor) [Multilayer network models (brief overview)]. Problems of computer science, 2021, no. 3, pp. 5-20.
2. Kim J., Vu V. H. Sandwiching random graphs: Universality between random graph models. Advances in Mathematics, 2004, vol. 188, pp. 444-469.
3. Dijkstra F., Andree B., Koymans K., Van der Ham J., Grosso P., and Laat C. A multi-layer network model based on ITU-T G.805. Computer Networks, 2008, vol. 52, pp. 1927-1937.
4. Rotaru S. Cross-layer design in wireless local area networks (WLANs): issues and possible solutions. 2018.
5. Kurant M., Thiran P. Layered Complex Networks. Physical review letters, 2006, vol. 96, pp. 138701.
6. Orlowski S., Raack C., Koster A., Baier G., Engel T., and Belotti P. Branch-and-Cut Techniques for Solving Realistic Two-Layer Network Design Problems, 2010, pp. 95-118.
7. Chigan C., Atkinson G., Nagarajan R. Onthe modeling issue of joint cross-layer network protection/restoration. Advanced Simulation Technologies Conference (ASTC '04), 2004, pp. 57-62.
8. Kivelä M., Arenas A., Barthelemy M., Gleeson J. P., Moreno Y., and Porter M. A. Multilayer networks. Journal of Complex Networks, 2013, vol. 2, pp. 203-271.
9. PopkovV. K., Sokolova O. D. Application of Hyperneet Theory for the Networks Optimazation Problems. 17th IMACS World Congress, Scientific Computation, Applied Mathematics and Simulation, 2005.
10. Boccaletti S., Bianconi G., Herrero R., Genio C., Gomez-Gardenes J., Romance M., Sendina-Nadal I., Z. Wang, and Zanin M. The Structure and Dynamics of Multilayer Networks. Physics Reports, 2014, vol. 544, pp. 1-122.
11. Domenico M. D., Granell C., Porter M. A., Andarenas A. The physics of spreading processes in multilayer networks. Nature Physics, 2016, vol. 12, pp. 901-906.
12. ITU-T Recommendation G.805: Generic functional architecture of transport networks : Rep. Tech. rep., International Telecommunication Union, 2000.
13. Popkov V. K. Primenenie teorii S-gipersetej dlya modelirovaniya sistem setevoj struktury [Application of the theory of S-hypernets for modeling network structure systems]. Problems of computer science, no. 4, 2010, pp. 17-40.
14. Rodionov A., Rodionova O. Random Hypernets in Reliability Analysis of Multilayer Networks. Electrical Engineering, 2015, vol. 343, pp. 307-315.
15. Kalney A. M. Optimizaciya razmeshcheniya kontrol'nyh ustrojstv na kanalah v setyah monitoringa [Optimizing the placement of control devices on channels in monitoring networks]. Problems of computer science, 2022, no. 4, pp. 28-38.
16. Rodionov A. S., Migov D. A. Obtaining and Using Cumulative Bounds of Network Reliability. System Reliability, 2017.
17. Valiant L. The complexity of computing the permanent. Theoretical Computer Science, 1979, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 189-201.
Review
For citations:
Kalney A.M., Rodionov A.S. One Problem of Structural Optimization of Data Transmission Networks. The Herald of the Siberian State University of Telecommunications and Information Science. 2024;18(3):45-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.55648/1998-6920-2024-18-3-45-56